Archive for the ‘Attorney Ethics’ Category

TOXIC PUNDIT: Alan James Brinkmeir Attorney Chicago IL

In Attorney Ethics, Internet defamation on May 14, 2015 at 6:32 pm

Last week I noticed an interesting case of drive-by punditry that is tantamount to libel, from someone who should’ve known better. Alan James Brinkmeir is an Attorney from Chicago IL, he is a contributor to the legal advice website A member of the public posted a question, about a message, that he or she had received, about a legitimate business that offered assistance for victims of mortgage fraud.

Allegedly defamatory allegations by Attorney Alan James Brinkmeir of Chicago IL

Allegedly defamatory allegations by Attorney Alan James Brinkmeir of Chicago IL

In response, Alan Brinkmeir stated that “it seems like a scam to me”, but then disguised the potentially defamatory comment by adding the disclaimer “in my opinion”. Genuine opinions are of course protected speech under the US First Amendment, and are not actionable in a defamation or libel claim. However, Mr. Brinkmeier is probably skating on thin ice in this case. Casting flaming aspersions such as this, presumably as a drive-by verbal assault on the business in question, without reviewing the original source documentation to which the question referred, begins to get dangerously close to other causes of action, such as tortuous interference with prospective financial gain. A hypothetical example might be where the lawyer was in a position to benefit financially by flaming the business, which offers services that cut the lawyer out of what could otherwise be a nice and expensive lawsuit. was contacted about the defamation, and apparently agreed with the complainant, because the injurious material was removed.

It is not currently know if Alan James Brinkmeir is an expert on Mortgage disputes, if he is not, then you have an attorney possibly acting as an expert, giving expert advice on a subject they have no expertise.

It never ceases to amaze me how otherwise intelligent, learned, and highly paid professionals can fall victim to their own impulses, by clicking a “submit” button without thinking through the full ramifications of their actions.

NEW EVIDENCE: Earl Hardisty Knows Tracey Richter Murdered Dustin Wehde

In Attorney Ethics, Justice Denied, Sociopaths on December 22, 2013 at 7:51 pm
SECRET AUDIO RECORDING – Earl Hardisty, ex-county attorney reveals there was no evidence for second intruder, he never believe Tracey’s story.
I had not intended to release this audio recording from March 22, 2004. However, Tracey Richter’s mother Anna Richter maintains that her fantastic argument for her daughter’s innocence is supported by the previous County Attorney, Earl Hardisty, who she says believes Tracey is innocent.

The recording was made in a meeting between myself (Michael Roberts), ex-County Attorney Earl Hardisty and Sheriff Ken McClure. This was made shortly after I decided to file for divorce, BUT I still wasn’t convinced of Tracey’s guilt. I first realized that Tracey Richter murdered Dustin Wehde during this meeting, I was so shocked by what they told me, I had to step out of the room. Evidently, the investigators thought I was protecting Tracey while we were married and later told me later that “we knew the case wouldn’t break until your marriage broke”.

Click to listen or download 2004 Recording Earl Hardisty, Sheriff Ken McClure and Michael Roberts

If Earl Hardisty really says that Tracey is innocent, I believe it is only to cover for the embarrassment of sitting on his hands for 10 years while Dustin’s family grieved. Keep in mind, Hardisty was an 8-year incumbent and was ousted by Sac County voters in favor of another attorney– from his own party! That in itself speaks volumes about the communities confidence in Hardisty’s abilities.

– See more at:

DISAVOWED: Rexxfield’s Michael Roberts Responds To Allegations That He Owns

In Attorney Ethics, Google's Omnipotence, Internet defamation, Redacted Revolt on September 30, 2013 at 6:42 am
DISAVOWED: Rexxfield's Michael Roberts Responds To Allegations He Owns Ed Magedson and his attornies Maria Crimi Speth & Adam Kunz have accused Michael Roberts of publishing the website

These allegations are denied; neither Michael Roberts,, or any of our Revolt Boycott activists have anything to do with the Scam Group website which appears to be administered from the Czech Republic.

Furthermore, we do not condone the publication of fictitious complaints about ANY organization, even those that support Ed Magedson’s financially. Our boycott is legitimate and factual protected free speech, it is also effective, we do not need to embellish the activities with lies as Magedson has alleged.

---- End Authorized Statement ---- 

– See more at:

Lisa Borodkin esq. Defeats & Ed Magedson’s In Lawsuit: Case Dismissed

In Attorney Ethics, Redacted Revolt on November 16, 2012 at 9:16 am
Attorney Lisa Borokin Defeats RipOffReport In Lawsuit

Attorney Lisa Borokin Defeats RipOffReport In Lawsuit - Ed Magedson Frustrated Again

Attorney Lisa Borodkin filed a motion for sanctions against owner Ed Magedson and his attorney for “asserting frivolous claims against her for an improper purpose.” Earlier, United States District Judge G. Murray Snow dismissed Ripoffreport’s the case against Borodkin.

The dismissal came shortly after Borodkin’s email to Ed Magedson’s attorney (and cc’d to various witnesses), where she stated: “As I told Magistrate Bade last week, it appears that your client, Ed Magedson, has lied about the only material aspect of your case.”

REF: No. 2:11-CV-01426-PHX-GMS United States District Court For The District Of Arizona.