BADFORPEOPLE

Archive for the ‘Internet defamation’ Category


Blue Trading Reviews Suggestions for Managing Digital Attacks

In Internet defamation on May 31, 2018 at 4:29 am

Blue Trading Reviews Management for Internet Attacks

By: Blue Trading Reviews

Google results often include top-ranking false accusations that ruin businesses and employment opportunities, here are some tips from Blue Trading on combating these problem Google results.

BlUE TRADING RECOMMENDS NOT TO FIGHT BACK

Whenever you notice a fallacious accusation submitted against you or your business concern, it is alright to submit a persuasive counterclaim immediately, but Blue Trading reviews recommends to keep it modest. The impugnment you are facing is a form of emotional war in which you either win or lose the minds of your would-be customers, depending on how you interact. But TAKE NOTE Blue Trading reviews: Issue ONLY a single counterclaim on the actual attack webpage, or else the defamatory webpage will probably attain more elevated Search engine ranks. By opening your one-time response with something similar to the opening below, you can easily indicate to visitors that the lack of other responses isn’t verification of guilt.

“I will not partake in a prolonged argument on this web site, as it will merely stimulate more malice from my unethical competitor (or other applicable description). Notwithstanding, I respectfully tender this single reply for the sake of my customers’ confidence”

CAREFULLY CRAFT YOUR REBUTTAL

When you decide to publish a rebuttal, Blue Trading reviews and suggests the following:

  1. Don’t respond to older articles on the problem page. Doing so would only raise the Google ranking. Google esteems dispute, and our research suggests cedes added weight to extended dialogues. You should just leave older pages to die.
  2. Don’t be overly defensive. Often, by calling out someone’s vehement strivings to convert some others of some topic, will make you appear defensive, and untruthful. State the truth, politely, without bashing the other party.
  3. Don’t name your enemy. Put to use 3rd person terms like “he” or “she” or you might just anger these people further. Moreover, it seems trashy and spiteful to the audience.
  4. Continue to post more favorable facts in connection with you and/or your institution. Sometimes the only remedy for hurtful rhetoric, is better speech. When you don’t have command of Google’s search results for your good name, other people take control. And without your input, it will likely finish terribly if he does not approve of you. If you have not published a lot in the way of pertinent, concise material about yourself, then Google will have nothing to rank about you, except the diatribe supplied by others. Including those who don’t like you and your livelihood.

OBTAIN QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL ONLINE REPUTATION MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE

IF YOUR DILEMMA JUSTIFIES THE EXPENDITURE

Professional Online Reputation Management operations are booming, as Google seems to mysteriously present at least one negative search engine result, for a large number of business concerns and entrepreneurs.

Nevertheless, be careful! You may have received SPAM emails from companies based in developing countries. Unfortunately, some make the most of desperate, distressed persons, searching for a quick fix for the injury being brought on by their Internet reputation dilemmas. Before hiring professionals, Blue Trading Reviews suggests to perform background checks, confirm that the practitioners you contract share your native language, and furnish complete transparency about who they are, and where they are located.

SOMETIMES LAWSUITS ARE THE BEST OPTION.

“I’ll sue you!” is often the number one response from a person unjustly tarnished by online defamation. However, such decision oftentimes brings along with it significant psychological weariness and distress. It is vital that you sit down, and take into account the emotional and financial consequences prior to opening that particular Pandora’s Box.

If you opt to enter a lawsuit against your critic, take into consideration to NOT look for financial damages; as the lawsuit will be less complicated. If your prime intention is the removal of the detractive Google results, then you might merely aim for (1) Declaratory Relief and (2) Injunctive Relief. While, declaratory relief is just a statement by the Court, that something is or is not so. As an example, if in your proceedings you ask the judge to state that the web-based accusations made against you are false, he or she will, with any luck , release findings to that effect. That being said, the court would probably likewise order that the maligning materials be blotted out from public access by the blogger. If the antagonist evades, then most of the time each of the online search engines will probably recognize the purpose of the judgment, findings, and edicts, and expunge the relevant material from their search indexes. This way, although the offending data persists inside the problem web page, let’s face it, if it is not listed in Google, it is unlikely anybody will find it. Ergo, your goal of setting right the continuous brand blemish will have been realized.

If your adversary discerns that the anguish he or she has been causing you has been removed, then the personal attack may possibly start all over again, that being the case you may go back to court and request the judge to provide succeeding orders. However ideally, the initial order will contain language that minimizes additional broadcasting of substantially similar statements.

Respectfully submitted by Blue Trading Reviews.

Official website

Email: [email protected]

Twitter

Facebook

Google+

Blue Trading video’s

DailyMotion

Wikia

Reviews for B.Trading

Company Blog

Blue T. Google site

Crunchbase

 


TechniTrader shares their view on the TechniTrader Complaints

In Internet Defamation Victims List on March 13, 2017 at 1:07 am

TechniTrader Complaints – Response from the company

When you have Googled for info on our trading and investing training business, you may have encountered a couple of TechniTrader complaints. We think you deserve to know the full story, so we opted to provide a reply to the online TechniTrader complaints.

We already posted a rebuttal as a response to a few of the complaints, which you might have seen, to share our side of the story on that particular issue. Additionally, numerous of our students have also published a response to the TechniTrader complaints, to share their positive experience with our training programs. Have a look for yourself to see what our students think about us.

We have always had an A+ rating with the Better Business Bureau, for as long as we have been in business. When receiving a genuinely submitted complaint, we always act immediately and efficiently. We have always been able to solve a formal request.

We provide this level of service because our # 1 goal is to offer the highest level of stock market education. We continuously renew our courses to keep up with transformations in the stock industry and other financing markets. We individually assist our students in making them able to develop their own trading plan and process. And this level of assistance is continuous; there is no time limitation for getting support with our trading programs.

When starting a trading program with TechniTrader, we don’t only provide you with a comprehensive education in the stock market and various styles of trading in our training course. You also obtain a constant support system.

Thank you for reading our TechniTrader complaints response. We hope that when you discover TechniTrader complaints when you Google for training on stock trading or investing, you will perform your own research into who we are, how we carry out business and what we deliver. We firmly believe that you will find that there isn’t a more qualified stock market training firm than TechniTrader.


DotHop ‘s Tips for Responding to Web Based Defamation – DotHop

In Internet Defamation Victims List on August 24, 2016 at 9:54 pm

DotHop’s Advice for Dealing With Online Defamation

DotHop

DotHop has graciously consented to us to give out remedial strategies so that others will be better trained, when incurring the fury of a web-based crazy maker, as DotHop has.

DotHop has been dealing with a vicious, ruthless, Internet defamation campaign.

DotHop’s antagonist has taken aim at the company to destroy the good name and reputation of the business, without justification, and accused DotHop of dreadful things that don’t need repeating.

Nevertheless, DotHop has learned a great deal from the struggle, and graciously permitted our team to impart this understanding freely so that other victims, could be far better equipped, be subjected to the rage of a web based troll, as DotHop has.

DotHop | Website

DotHop | Facebook

DotHop | DailyMotion

DotHop | Youtube

STEP # 1: WITHDRAW! AVOID A FLAME WAR

If you see a concocted gripe filed against you and your business, it is okay to submit a convincing rebuttal asap, nevertheless try to keep it humble. The vilifications against you are a variety of intellectual combat; you will probably win or lose the minds of your future customers, depending on how you behave. BEAR IN MIND: Simply publish a single defense on the actual gripe internet page, or else the webpage will achieve greater Google standings. You are able to demonstrate to the audience that the lack of other replies isn’t evidence of guilt, by kicking off your one-time response with something along these lines:

“I will not interact in an ongoing debate on this web site, it will simply evoke additional contempt from my stalker (or other appropriate description). However, I do respectfully put forward this single response for the benefit of my clients’ confidence”

STEP # 2: FOLLOW THESE BASIC RULES IF YOU DO REPLY

  1. DO NOT counter older articles on the problem page (“necroposting”), this will only increase their search engine positioning, Google thrives with dispute, and our tests indicate that it dispenses further value to evolving exchanges. The best action in such cases is no action, just leave older pages to die.
  2. DO NOT be too defensive, remember Shakespeare: “The lady doth protest too much, methinks” that is an excerpt from the 1600s stage performance Hamlet.This is applied as hyperbole, in a variety of phrasings, to portray someone’s vehement endeavours to convince others of some thing, and in so doing making him or herself seem defensive, and deceptive.
  3. DO NOT name your accuser. Utilise third person descriptions including “he” or “she”. If you use their name or business name, you’ll probably incense these people even more. Furthermore, it appears resentful and trashy to the readers. Coolness = Class.
  4. DO PUBLISH more beneficial text referring to you and your corporation, now and then the only remedy for poor commentary, is more speech. In the event that you do not take command of Google’s search engine results for your good name, another person will do it for you, without your permission, and it will most likely finish horribly if he or she doesn’t esteem you. If you do not have very much in the way of useful, concise content about yourself, then Google will have nothing to rank about you, except the content provided by others, including those who may not like you and your family.

STEP # 3: GET FREE AID WITH DIY TUTORIAL TO MENDING YOUR WEB-BASED REPUTATION QUANDARY

  1. A team of dedicated online reputation management gurus have generously given up their experience and strategies, to this non-profit online resource namely Defamation911.org
  2. That same team controls a complimentary advice blog site at www.blog.page1.me
  3. The Facebook page is https://www.facebook.com/defamation911/

STEP # 4: SECURE PROFESSIONAL ONLINE REPUTATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES IF YOUR PREDICAMENT JUSTIFIES THE INVESTMENT

Fee Based Online Reputation Management companies are growing, due to the fact that Google (GODgle?) seems to mysteriously present a minimum of 1 unfavorable search result, for many firms and entrepreneurs.

NEVERTHELESS BE CAREFUL!

There’s Numerous Online Reputation Remediation are based in developing nations, unfortunately some make the most of desperate, distressed consumers, searching for a quick fix for the damages being caused by their Internet reputation difficulties. Perform research, verify that the professionals you hire speak your native language, and offer verified documentation about their business, and precisely where they run their operation.

STEP # 5: AVOID IT PREFERABLY – BUT A LAWSUIT COULD BE THE FASTEST FIX.

“I’ll sue you!” is typically the number one reaction from a person scandalized by online defamation. Never the less, this kind of decision very often brings with it significant mental fatigue and misery. It is vital that you catch one’s breath, and take into account the emotional and financial toll before opening that particular Pandora’s Box.

If you do decide to enter a suit against your critic, take into consideration NOT looking for monetary damages; as the litigation will be much less challenging. If your vital objective is the elimination of the insulting search engine result, then you might just look for (1) Declaratory Relief and (2) Injunctive Relief. Whilst, declaratory relief is just a notice by the Judge, that a specific thing is or is not so. As an example, if in your legal action you ask the judge to pronounce that the online accusations made against you are contrary to fact, he or she will, hopefully, announce findings to that tone. For these reasons, the judge could very well even order that the derogatory texts be purged from public access by the author. If the antagonist protests, then most of the time each of the internet search engines will likely recognize the intent of the judgment, conclusions, and directives, and delete the offending content from their particular search indexes. This way, despite the fact that the libelous content persists within just the original website, let’s face it, if it isn’t displayed in Google, it is extremely unlikely anybody will encounter it. Ergo, your mission of controlling the constant brand blemish will have been effected.

If your defamer discerns that the problem thathe or she has been causing you has been expunged, then the character assassination may possibly begin again, at this point you could return to court and request the court to provide subsequent injunctions. But ideally, the initial directives will consist of language that controls future broadcasting of similar allegations.

 

,

Carmelo Cerrelli ‘s Guidance for Managing Web Based Defamation – Carmelo Cerrelli

In Internet Defamation Victims List on August 15, 2016 at 2:17 am

Carmelo Cerrelli’s Guidance for Surviving Internet Harassment

Carmelo Cerrelli has been struggling with a malicious, unrelenting, Web libel campaign.

Carmelo Cerrelli’s accuser has targeted him to tarnish his reputation without reason, and alleged that he is guilty of nasty things that do not deserve repeating.

Yet, Carmelo Cerrelli has learned a great deal through the ordeal, & has graciously made it possible for us to share this enlightenment openly in order that other victims who are subjected to the rage of an online troll, as Carmelo Cerrelli has , could be much better equipped.

STEP # 1: DETACH! DON’T FEED THE TROLLS

Carmelo Cerrelli 's Guidance for Surviving Internet Harassment

Carmelo Cerrelli ‘s Guidance for Surviving Internet Harassment

When you find a concocted accusation posted about you or your business, it is okay to respond with a persuasive counterclaim in a timely manner, but keep it polite. The slanders facing you are a kind of psychological combat; you may win or lose the hearts of your hoped-for patrons, depending on how you answer. NOTE: Merely publish a single answer on the actual gripe internet-site, if you don’t the complaint will likely obtain higher Search engine standings. You will demonstrate to the audience that the lack of successive responses is not proof of guilt, by kicking off your single response with something along these lines:

“I will not engage an on-going discussion on this web page, it will likely whip up further hatred from my unethical competitor (or other relevant summary). Nevertheless, I do respectfully tender this single reply for the benefit of my clienteles’ assurance”

STEP # 2: CAREFULLY PLAN YOUR RESPONSE

  1. DO NOT respond to aged articles on the problem page, or you can simply increase their search engine ranking, Google is crazy about dispute, & grants more weight to ongoing topics. The best action in such cases is no action, just allow old articles drop off.
  2. Don’t be overly defensive, do not forget Shakespeare: “The lady doth protest too much, methinks” that is a quote from the 1600s stage play Hamlet.It is used as a figure of speech, , to represent someone’s too frequent and eager attempts to persuade other people of some issue, as a result making him or herself appear defensive, and insincere.
  3. DON’T identify your defamer. Utilise 3rd person terms including “he” or “she”. If you use their name or business name, you will probably anger these people even more. Moreover, it appears cheesy and vengeful to the audience. Self-discipline = Classy.
  4. DO PUBLISH more desirable blogs & posts in relation to you and/or your corporation, there are times the only antidote for poor diatribe, is much more speech. If you do not have charge of Google’s search engine results page for your full name, someone else probably will, with or without your consent, and it will probably finish badly if she does not like you. If you do not have very much in the way of important, authoritative content about yourself, then Google will have no choice but to present the content generated by others, including those who may not like you and your family.

STEP # 3: GET AID WITH DO IT YOURSELF GUIDES TO REMEDIATION OF YOUR WEB IMAGE CHALLENGES

  1. A group of professional online reputation management specialists have generously given way their experience and tips, to a self-help website namely Defamation911.org
  2. This very same crew maintains a no cost strategy blog site at www.blog.page1.me
  3. The Facebook page is https://www.facebook.com/defamation911/

STEP # 4: GET PROFESSIONAL ONLINE REPUTATION MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE IF THE DILEMMA WARRANTS THE INVESTMENT

Professional Online Reputation Repair operations are growing, owing to Google’s search algorithm, which seems to include at the very least, 1 undesirable search engine result, for many enterprises and business people.

HOWEVER BE CAREFUL!

SPAM email comes from Countless Online reputation Repair are based in developing nations, many capitalize on despondent, aggrieved people, looking for a quick fix for the devastation being a result of their online reputation problems. Carry out reference checks, verify that the specialists you engage speak your native vernacular, and offer complete transparency about who they are, and where they are located.

STEP # 5: STAY AWAY FROM IT IF POSSIBLE – BUT JUDICIAL PROCEEDING MAY BE THE FASTEST FIX.

“I’ll sue you!” is quite often the number one reply from a person unjustly bad-mouthed by online defamation. Never the less, this type of response quite often delivers with it tremendous psychological weariness and woe. It is vital that you relax, and take into account the financial and emotional consequence prior to opening up that Pandora’s Box.

If you decide to enter a law suit against your antagonist, think about NOT looking for financial damages; as the case will be much less complicated. If your prime goal is the removal of the injurious search engine result, then you can simply look for (1) Declaratory Relief and (2) Injunctive Relief. Whereas, declaratory relief is only an acknowledgment by the Court, that a specific thing is or is not so. For example, if in your legal action you ask the court to proclaim that the online accusations made against you are misrepresentative, he or she will, subsequently, declare findings to that effect. Consequently, the court may well even order that the maligning materials be deleted from public view by the artice writer. If the artice writer protests, then in many cases every of the online search engines will most likely recognize the intention of the verdict, conclusions, and instructions, and get rid of the offending text from their search indexes. This way, even though the defamatory text endures within just the problem website, in effect, if it is not displayed in search results, it is not likely anyone will view it. As such, your intention of repairing the ongoing reputation damage will have been reached.

If your adversary finds that the injury thathe or she caused you has been deleted, then the injury of reputation could commence again, that being the case you can return to the judge and request the judge to provide additional injunctions. However hopefully, the original order will consist of language that impedes additional dissemination of substantially similar accusations.

,

Missouri Wind and Solar ‘s Tips for Dealing With Web Based Libel 

In Internet Defamation Victims List on August 12, 2016 at 12:58 am

Missouri Wind and Solar ‘s Ideas for Surviving Internet Attacks

Missouri Wind and Solar's accuser has targeted the firm in an attempt to tarnish Missouri Wind and Solar's organization, without validation, and accused Missouri Wind and Solar of heinous actions that don't merit repeating. Despite this, Missouri Wind and Solar has discovered a lot from the trial, and graciously gave permission for us to share this clear thinking freely so that others, will be far better readied, be subjected to the fury of an on-line reputation siege, as Missouri Wind and Solar has.

Missouri Wind and Solar’s accuser has targeted the firm in an attempt to tarnish Missouri Wind and Solar’s organization, without validation, and accused Missouri Wind and Solar of heinous actions that don’t merit repeating.
Despite this, Missouri Wind and Solar has discovered a lot from the trial, and graciously gave permission for us to share this clear thinking freely so that others, will be far better readied, be subjected to the fury of an on-line reputation siege, as Missouri Wind and Solar has.

Missouri Wind and Solar has been toiling with a harmful, unyielding, cyber defamation offensive.

Missouri Wind and Solar ‘s protagonist targeted Missouri Wind and Solar in an attempt to destroy the online reputation of the firm, with no validation, and indicated Missouri Wind and Solar in some scandalous concerns that do not need repeating.

Yet, Missouri Wind and Solar has discovered much through the test, & generously authorized us to bestow this knowledge publicly in order that you, the reader, can be best readied, should you ever the fury of an online reputation siege, as Missouri Wind and Solar has.

Talk to Missouri Wind and Solar directly

Missouri Wind and Solar Website
Facebook
LinkedIn
Youtube
Twitter

STEP # 1: WITHDRAW! STRATEGIC WITHDRAWAL

Should you discover a spurious criticism submitted against you or your organization, it is fine to submit a compelling counterargument promptly, however try to keep it polite. The slanders against you are a kind of psychological war; you are going to win or lose the minds of your hoped-for patrons, depending on how you interact. BEAR IN MIND: Only post one answer on the actual gripe webpage, or else the webpage will probably receive more elevated Google.com rankings. You can indicate to the audience that the absence of other replies isn’t verification of guilt, by opening up your one-time reply with something like this: 

“I will not participate in an extended discussion on this site, it will simply incite even more derision from my antagonist (or other relevant portrayal). But, I do respectfully put forward this single reply for the interest of my customers’ confidence”

STEP # 2: FOLLOW THESE BASIC RULES IF YOU DO RESPOND

  1. DO NOT respond to outdated articles on the complaint site, this can simply spike their Google rank, Google loves controversy, and our research suggests provides further value to perpetual altercations. It is prudent permit older posts pass away.
  2. Don’t be highly defensive, take into account Shakespeare: “The lady doth protest too much, methinks” that is an excerpt from the 1599 stage performance Hamlet.This has been applied as a turn of phrase, , to call out someone’s too frequent and desperate attempts to persuade other people of some topic, thus making him or herself seem defensive, and deceptive.
  3. DON’T mention your accuser. Utilize third person terms such as “he” or “she”. Or else, you’ll simply incense these people even more. More importantly, it looks cheesy and spiteful to the readers. Restraint = Elegance.
  4. DO POST more good blogs & posts relative to you or your firm, from time to time the only cure for ruinous speech, is a lot more speech. If you don’t have control of Google’s search results for your full name, someone else may, with or without your permission, and it may end negatively if she doesn’t care for you. If you haven’t posted a lot in the way of important, authoritative articles about yourself, then Google will have nothing to rank about you, except the garbage offered by others, some of whom wish to destroy you and your business.

STEP # 3: GET FREE TIPS WITH DO IT YOURSELF ADVICE TO FIXING YOUR WEB-BASED REPUTATION DILEMMA

  1. A team of dedicated online reputation management wizards have generously given way their wisdom and strategies, to this self-help online resource called Defamation911.org
  2. This same group provides a free information blog site at www.blog.page1.me
  3. The Facebook page is https://www.facebook.com/defamation911/

STEP # 4: GET EXPERIENCED ONLINE REPUTATION MANAGEMENT SUPPORT IF THE ISSUE JUSTIFIES THE CHARGES

Professional Online Reputation Management enterprises are booming, owing to Google’s search program, which seems to mysteriously include at minimum 1 impugning search engine result, for many business enterprises and entrepreneurs.

BUT BE CAREFUL!

SPAM email comes from Online reputation Repair Services based in developing countries, who make the most of frantic, unhappy persons, seeking a fast fix for the infliction being a result of their digital reputation dilemmas. Don’t neglect your research, see to it that the practitioners you retain write in your native lingo, and that they provide complete transparency about their business, and the place where they are located.

STEP # 5: GET AROUND IT IF YOU CAN – BUT A LAW SUIT MIGHT BE THE ONLY ANSWER.

“See you in court!” is in many cases the first reply from a person unjustly sullied by online defamation. Even so, this type of action generally brings with it tremendous emotional burnout and distress. It is vital that you sit down, and carefully count the emotional and financial consequence prior to opening that particular Pandora’s Box.

If you elect to enter a proceedings against your detractor, take into consideration NOT looking for monetary damages; as the case will be much less challenging. If your primary ambition is the removal of the detractive search results, then you might just only ask for (1) Declaratory Relief and (2) Injunctive Relief. While, declaratory relief is simply a declaration by the Law Court, that something is or is not so. As an example, if in your claim you ask the judge to proclaim that the online accusations made against you are fictitious, he or she will, simply, announce conclusions to that effect. Consequently, the court might even order that the detracting texts be expunged from public access by the antagonist. If the writer dissents, then in many cases all of the online search engines will likely comply with the objective of the judgment, results, and injunctions, and delete the relevant text from their respective search indexes. In this way, whether or not the libelous text continues inside of the original web site, the fact remains that, if it is not available in Google, it is unlikely anyone will locate it. Ergo, your intention of mitigating the ongoing reputation hardship will have been realised.

If your defamer sees that the heartache he or she caused you has been deleted, then the defamation of character may possibly start again, if so you may go back to the judge and ask the court to issue other injunctions. However ideally, the original directives will include language that prohibits future broadcasting of substantially similar statements.

,

Chad Chiniquy ’s Recommendations for Surviving Web Based Harassment

In Internet Defamation Victims List on June 29, 2016 at 12:44 am

Chad Chiniquy ‘s Tips for Managing Internet Attacks

Chad_Chiniquy_Slander_Response_BFP

Chad Chiniquy’s antagonist has targeted him with no reason and accused him of repulsive things. However, Chad Chiniquy has discovered a great deal from the journey and graciously made it possible for us to publish this understanding openly so that you, the reader, may be best informed when incurring the indignation of an online crazy-maker, as Chad Chiniquy has.

Chad Chiniquy has been battling a ferocious, cyber libel attack.

Chad Chiniquy ‘s attacker is intent on destroying him as well as his company, with no reason, and indicated him in some unfounded allegations that don’t merit repeating.

Even so, Chad Chiniquy has learned a great deal from the ordeal, and generously consented to us to yield these methods publicly so that you, the reader, can be a lot better trained, when subjected to the fury of an online troll, as Chad has.

Contact Chad Chiniquy

Chad Chiniquy | LinkedIn
Chad Chiniquy | Youtube
Chad Chiniquy | Facebook
Company | Find, Fund and Flip Systems
Chad’s Real Estate Seminars 

STEP # 1: DISENGAGE! AVOID A FLAME WAR

If you spot a fake complaint submitted against you and your business, it is fine to post a strong rebuttal immediately, nevertheless try to keep it deferential. The calumnies against you are a variety of emotional war; you will most likely win or lose the minds of your would-be customers, depending on how you respond. BEAR IN MIND: Just issue one defense on the actual gripe internet page, or else the damaging accusations can gain increased Search engine standings. You are able to indicate to the viewers that the lack of successive replies is not proof of guilt, by beginning your one-time reply with something similar to this:

“I will not engage an extended argument on this site, it will merely ignite more malice by my detractor (or other pertinent portrayal). However, I do respectfully submit this single response for the interest of my patrons’ consideration.”

STEP # 2: BE CAREFUL HOW YOU REPLY

  1. DO NOT act in response to older complaints on the problem page, this will only spike the search engine ranking, Google thrives on debate, and our tests indicate that it grants further weight to on-going controversies. Just leave old posts to expire.
  2. DO NOT be excessively defensive, consider Shakespeare: “The lady doth protest too much, methinks” that is an excerpt from the 1599 theater play Hamlet. This has been applied in a manner of speaking, in a variety of phrasings, to portray someone’s frantic and too frequent endeavors to convince the public of something, and thus making him or herself look defensive and two-faced.
  3. DON’T mention your accuser. Utilize third person terms such as “he” or “she”. Otherwise, you’ll likely anger them further. More to the point, it seems vindictive and trashy to the readers. Restraint = Classy.
  4. Continue to publish more beneficial information touching on you or your business enterprise, every once in awhile the only antidote for deleterious speech, is much more chatter. If you don’t have command of Google’s search results page for your full name, someone else will, with or without your permission, and it will certainly end terribly if she doesn’t fancy you. If you haven’t posted a lot of useful, concise articles about yourself, then Google has no choice but to present the garbage generated by others, including those who despise you and your family.

STEP # 3: GET FREE HELP WITH DO IT YOURSELF GUIDES TO CURING YOUR WEB-BASED REPUTATION PICKLE

  1. A team of professional online reputation management masters has happily entrusted their experience and processes, to this charitable online resource called Defamation911.org
  2. The very same crew keeps a complimentary information internet site at www.blog.page1.me
  3. Their Facebook page is https://www.facebook.com/defamation911/

STEP # 4: OBTAIN EXPERIENCED ONLINE REPUTATION MANAGEMENT AID IF THE ISSUE WARRANTS THE CHARGES

Fee-Based Online Reputation Repair operations are expanding since Google seems to provide at least one impugning search result, for a large number of ventures and entrepreneurs.

HOWEVER, BE CAREFUL!

SPAM email comes from ORM Services based in developing regions, some capitalize on desperate, distressed people, searching for immediate help for the hardship being a result of their digital reputation quandaries. Do your reference checks, verify that the experts you contract share your native vernacular, and provide verified documentation about who they are, and specifically where they run their operation.

STEP # 5: REFRAIN FROM IT IF YOU CAN – BUT JUDICIAL PROCEEDING MAY BE THE FASTEST FIX.

“I’ll sue you!” is oftentimes the first reaction from a person unjustly marred by online defamation. Even so, this type of response typically brings with it significant emotional debilitation and misery. It is essential that you sit down, and the financial and emotional toll before opening up such a can of worms.

Online_Defamation_010If you do choose to enter a lawsuit against your detractor, think about NOT seeking monetary damages; as the case will be much less challenging. If your primary ambition is the removal of the defamatory Google results, then you can simply look for (1) Declaratory Relief and (2) Injunctive Relief. While, declaratory relief is only a statement by the Court/Judge, that one thing is or is not so. As an example, if in your case you ask the bench to pronounce that the web-based accusations made against you are fake, he or she will, we hope, declare conclusions to that tone. Which means that, the judge will likely likewise order that the libelous contents be eliminated from public view by the author. If the blogger protests, then in many cases every of the online search engines will most likely observe the intent of the ruling, conclusions, and decrees, and get rid of the offending content from their respective search indexes. In this way, despite the fact that the libelous content continues inside the original website, in effect, if it doesn’t show in Google, it is extremely unlikely people will discover it. Ergo, your goal of rectifying the growing brand injury will have been reached.

If your defamer sees that the injury he or she has been causing you has been deleted, then the malicious defamation might begin all over again, that being the case you could go back to court and request the court to issue other orders. But ideally, the first directives will contain language that regulates future publishing of similar allegations.

,

Claudia Della Mora ‘s Tips for Dealing With Internet Smear Campaigns – Black Legend Capital

In Internet Defamation Victims List on June 26, 2016 at 1:44 pm

Claudia Della Mora’s Tips and Advice for Surviving Web Based Libel – Black Legend Capital

Claudia Della Mora's protagonist has targeted her & her corporation, without cause, and accused her of shameful acts that do not warrant repeating. However, Claudia Della Mora has learned much from the ordeal, and has graciously authorized our team to post these ideas openly so that others, may be prepared, when incurring the fury of a web based assault, as Claudia Della Mora has.

Claudia Della Mora’s protagonist has targeted her & her corporation, without cause, and accused her of shameful acts that do not warrant repeating.
However, Claudia Della Mora has learned much from the ordeal, and has graciously authorized our team to post these ideas openly so that others may be prepared, when incurring the fury of a web based assault, as Claudia Della Mora has.

Claudia Della Mora has been dealing with a spiteful, remorseless, Internet smear campaign. Ms. Mora’s protagonist was intent on destroying her, along with her company, without validation, and implicated her is some unfounded assertions that do not need restating. Despite this, Claudia Della Mora has discovered a great deal from the episode, and generously authorized us to distribute this knowledge freely in order that other victims, could be better trained, should you ever incur the fury of an internet-based assault, as Claudia Della Mora has.

Connect with Claudia Della Mora

Claudia Della Mora| LinkedIn
Claudia Della Mora| Youtube
Claudia Della Mora| Facebook
Black Legend Capital

STEP # 1: BACK OUT! AVOID A FLAME WAR

If you notice a bogus accusation posted against you and your organization, it is O.K. to respond with a convincing counterargument instantly, however keep it respectful. The abuses against you are a kind of intellectual war; you are going to win or lose the hearts of your hoped-for patrons, depending on how you answer back. TAKE NOTE: Only post one rebuttal on the actual attack web site, or else the web page will certainly attain elevated Search engine positions. You might show the audience that the lack of successive responses is not confirmation of guilt, by starting your single reply with something along these lines:

“I will not take part in an extended argument on this web site, it will simply stir even more hatred from my stalker (or other pertinent summary). However, I do respectfully publish this one-time reply for the sake of my clienteles’ peace of mind”

STEP # 2: CAREFULLY PLAN YOUR REBUTTAL

  1. DO NOT act in response to older articles on the problem page (“necroposting”), doing so will just raise its search engine positioning, Google fancies conflict, and our research suggests grants further ranking to prolonged rants. It is best to leave ancient pages pass away.
  2. DO NOT be overly defensive, consider Shakespeare: “The lady doth protest too much, methinks” which is an excerpt from the 1599 theater play Hamlet.This is used as a manner of speaking, in a number of expressions, to portray someone’s too frequent and vehement endeavours to persuade other people of some matter, consequently making themselves seem defensive, and phony.
  3. DO NOT name your foe. Utilise third person descriptions like “he” or “she”. Otherwise, you will just infuriate them further. More importantly, it seems spiteful and sleazy to the visitors. Constraint = Elegance.
  4. Continue to post desirable content in connection with you or your business enterprise, in many instances the only fix for ruinous rhetoric, is a lot more chatter. If you do not have control of Google’s search engine results page for your good name, another person may beat you to it, without your input, and it definitely will finish terribly if he does not take delight in you. If you have not published much of pertinent, well written web content about yourself, then Google has nothing to rank about you, except the content produced by others, some of whom wish to destroy you and your family.

STEP # 3: GET FREE SUPPORT WITH DO-IT-YOURSELF HANDBOOK TO RESTORING YOUR INTERNET CREDIBILITY AND REPUTATION CHALLENGES

  1. A crew of professional online reputation management ninjas have graciously yielded their knowledge and tips, to this free help web site called Defamation911.org
  2. The very same group provides a freebie strategy blog site at www.blog.page1.me
  3. Their Facebook page is https://www.facebook.com/defamation911/

STEP # 4: OBTAIN EXPERIENCED ONLINE REPUTATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES IF THE DILEMMA JUSTIFIES THE EXPENSE

Fee Based Online Reputation Management operations are expanding, since Google (GODgle?) seems to present at least one harmful search engine result, for a large number of business enterprises and business people.

NEVERTHELESS BE CAREFUL!

SPAM email comes from ORM Services based in developing countries, some make the most of despairing, wounded persons, searching for a quick fix for the injury being triggered by their personal search engine result dilemmas. Carry out research, make certain that the professionals you engage share your native tongue, and provide full disclosure about their identity, and precisely where they are located.

STEP # 5: DODGE IT WHERE POSSIBLE – BUT LAWSUITS MAY BE THE ONLY WAY YOU CAN GET RELIEF.

“I’ll sue you!” is quite often the number one reply from a person unjustly maligned by online defamation. Regardless, this kind of action normally carries with it tremendous mental weariness and anguish. It is vital that you relax, and mindfully the emotional and financial toll prior to opening that particular can of worms.

If you decide to enter a legal action against your antagonist, think about NOT looking for monetary damages; if so the law suit will be less challenging. If your vital ambition is the removal of the derogatory search results, then you might only ask for (1) Declaratory Relief and (2) Injunctive Relief. While, declaratory relief is just a notice by the Court/Judge, that one thing is or is not so. For example, if in your proceedings you ask the bench to pronounce that the internet-based accusations made against you are concocted, he or she will, we hope, announce conclusions to that tone. Which means that, the judge might likewise order that the libelous contents be removed from public access by the writer. If the defendant declines, then most of the time all of the search engines would honor the objective of the judgment, findings, and injunctions, and remove the relevant information from their particular search indexes. By doing this, whether or not the injurious content continues inside of the original website or blog, in effect, if it is not available in Google, it is extremely unlikely anybody will see it. Ergo, your intention of repairing the on-going character catastrophe will have been obtained.

If your opponent discerns that the torment he or she caused you has been removed, then the malicious defamation might commence all over again, at this point you may go back to the judge and ask the judge to provide other injunctions. But ideally, the initial directives will incorporate language that impedes additional instances of similar claims.

, , ,

James Petulla: Is Higher Education A Ripoff?

In Bad Customer Service Experiences, Internet defamation, Online Defamation Rebuttal, Redacted Revolt, Uncategorized on October 24, 2015 at 6:48 pm
James Petulla

James Petulla. CEO Recording Radio Film Connection

James Petulla did not start out to be an educator. Back in the mid-80s, after working for a few months with the Columbia School of Broadcasting in his capacity as a San Jose radio DJ, he realized that CSB was not doing their students any favors. As Petulla stated, “They were ripping off their students. The textbooks were ancient, the equipment outdated, and their teachers out of touch.”

James presented a mentor/apprentice concept of education to the Columbia School of Broadcasting because he knew it would work to prepare students for a career in broadcasting. His plan was rejected as being unworkable and logistically unsound. Undeterred, James decided to start his own business, offering mentoring services to radio broadcasting students in the San Jose area.

Fast forward 30 years and James Petulla is the CEO of Radio Recording Film Connection which offers mentor apprenticeships in radio broadcasting, music recording and film directing and producing. Industry veterans have flocked to the concept, allowing the company to have professional mentors in all 50 states.
Along the way, James Petulla has never lost sight of his original premise: the mentor/apprentice model of education is fundamentally a better approach to education if the desired result upon graduation is to have a career. “Students are not only learning the ropes from working industry professionals, they are doing so in their mentor’s place of business—a recording studio, a radio station, a film production company—so they are constantly being exposed to how business gets done in the real world. You simply can’t duplicate this environment on a school campus. Additionally, because student apprentices work on their mentor’s projects they are interacting with clients, producers, directors, DJs and other industry professionals and this allows them to network within the industry. Essentially, our programs place our students inside the music, film and radio industries which is a huge advantage.”

There’s another fundamental difference in the approach of Radio Recording Film Connection, as defined by James Petulla, and other trade schools and colleges. “Most schools are driven by how many of their students graduate—that’s their end game. At Radio Recording Film Connection, our goal is to get as many of our graduates employment as possible. Right now we’re approaching 80% success rate in this goal—almost 80% of our graduates find meaningful employment within the industry within six months of graduation.”

This is more than just lip service. Radio Recording Film Connection has a dedicated Job Placement department that starts working with the student from their first lesson up until a year after they graduate. Their duties include unlimited free tutoring, help with resumes and interviews, as well as matching students with job openings as they come up. The results speak for themselves.

Another fact that James Petulla is particularly proud of is the low tuition charged by Radio Recording Film Connection. “What good does it do the student to graduate from a trade school with $30,000 to $100,000 in permanent student debt obligations? Debts kill dreams. We work very hard to keep our tuition low—almost all of our programs are priced at less than $10,000.”

When asked to reflect on his journey, Petulla responds, “If you asked me 30 years ago where I’d be today I probably would have said I see myself being a successful disc jockey like a Howard Stern. Today, I’m grateful for the path I ended up taking. I’m privileged to be a part of a process where we are helping future Howard Sterns reach their potential.”

, ,

AVOID USED CAR SCAMS: Auto Connection Manassas VA CEO Offers Tips

In Internet defamation, Online Defamation Victims on August 14, 2015 at 9:23 pm

I’ve seen and heard of just about every auto related scam out there as the CEO of Auto Connection in Manassas, Virginia. Everybody loves to save money, and buying a used car instead of a new one can help you do that. However, there is risk to this reward: It’s possible to lose thousands on scams and fraudulent practices if you’re not careful.

While most sellers you’ll come across are legitimate folks just trying to sell their old car, it is still possible to come across one who is willing to scam or defraud you. Financially dangerous schemes appear to be on the rise now thanks to the Internet, where some don’t hesitate to list false information to lure in an unsuspecting buyer. Common methods deployed by corrupt, shady, money-hungry shysters can catch you by surprise.

I want to warn you of the most popular used car con-artist techniques out there and help you avoid them.

One corrupt used car salesman cost us thousands.

One corrupt used car salesman costs us thousands.

Over the Phone Highball Offer Scam

Maybe you have an old car you’d like to trade in towards your next used car. You give the dealer a call and are pleasantly surprised to hear a very attractive number if you bring in the vehicle.

Once you arrive, the shifty, calculating dealer inspects your car and refuses to honor the original value. The purpose was to have you arrive at the showroom where you’ve already wasted time going there; now they can wear you down to a price you’ll find acceptable enough if it means you’ll just be done with it already.

To avoid this, shop in-person with numerous dealers. Any offer that you hear from someone who hasn’t inspected the vehicle means nothing. Losers will say anything to make a sale. If you’re told how much your car is worth to them over the phone the figure you are given will always be a lie. Run in the opposite direction of such fraudsters.

Changing Lease Numbers

Leases aren’t easy to read, and car sellers know it. Some dealers will fix the numbers listed within the contract, which is literally a means of stealing your money over time. This includes increasing money factors and upping the capital cost.

The best way to prevent this is to have an idea of what terminology is used in leasing and how phrasing goes. If in doubt, have a qualified 3rd party review the contract so that you don’t fall prey to such bad business.

Adding to the Lease

Even if the dealer doesn’t change the numbers directly, it may include needless add-ons like extended warranties or pin stripping in the agreement. The former is not needed as the warranty you get will usually cover anything for the duration of a lease. Other fees are placed secretively in the capitalized cost area of your agreement. Less informed consumers will never notice the higher monthly cost.

Every scammer in the auto industry knows this little trick!

Again, the best way to avoid this would be to understand how leasing works and check the agreement thoroughly to ensure all the agreed-upon numbers add up. Homework will keep you from becoming yet another one of the unscrupulous dealer’s victims.

Fraudulent Odometer

Contrary to popular belief, it is easier to manipulate a digital odometer than an analog one. Devious, underhanded sorts will use fairly cheap software to reprogram the odometer and recalibrate otherwise faulty meters to make it seem like the car is less used than it is. It is estimated that billions will be lost each year; it is possible that up to 10 percent of used cars have tampered odometers.

The best way to avoid this is to get the VIN and order a free check and history list. Compare what the odometer says to the numbers listed here.

Good Guy / Bad Guy

Much like the old cop routine, one salesman is a trustworthy, honest sort, but the other can be aggressive, rude, demeaning and overbearing. The idea is to wear you down until you eventually agree to a poor deal.

Naturally, the easiest way to avoid this type of swindle is to avoid negotiations at the dealership or build a relationship with a salesman before doing business with him.

Early Repairs

Service centers make big bank on worn accessories and replacement parts. A double-crossing dealer mechanic will tell you that the brake pads are bad and need replacement when they still have plenty of life left. It’s known that most are willing to accept repairs to their vehicles without any further questions.

To avoid getting ripped off, hire your own independent mechanic to inspect the vehicle or get a second opinion before agreeing to a repair.

, , , ,

CALLOUS: Mark Jeftovic CEO easyDNS Reviews Willful Blindness and Defamation

In Internet defamation, ISP Ethics on July 26, 2015 at 8:18 am
let_it_be_knownMark Jeftovic CEO of easyDNS appears to have taken a position that is diametrically opposite to that of the Good Samaritan. His company seems to have taken a position of Willful Blindness (sometimes called ignorance of law, willful ignorance or contrived ignorance or Nelsonian knowledge). This is a legal term used which describes a scenario in which a person tries to avoid civil, criminal, or in this case moral liability, for a wrongful act, by intentionally putting him or herself in a position, where he or she can claim to be unaware of facts that would render him or her culpable.
.
We take issue with the following excerpt from Mark Jeftovic of easyDNS.com’s June 19, 2015 post:
.
Mark Jeftovic CEO of easyDNS Reviews provides platform for defamation while turning a blind eye to the plight of victims.

CALLOUS: Mark Jeftovic CEO of easyDNS Reviews provides platform for defamation while turning a blind eye to the plight of victims.

“If litigants want to pursue specific [easyDNS] customers they will always be better served to leave the ISPs and the vendors out of it, that way they can truly sit where they belong – as impartial observers on the sidelines awaiting a legal decision one way or the other.”

.– See more at: http://blog.easydns.org/2015/06/19/andy-lehrer-victorious-against-tim-rourke-causepimps/.

Whereas, notwithstanding the legal immunity provisions for Internet service providers, easyDNS IS NOT an “…impartial observers on the sidelines”. When Mark Jeftovic and easyDNS.com continues to knowingly provide, after notification, a publication platform for defamation and harassment, it they are most certainly morally culpable. The United Nations International Bill of Human Rights, Article 12 states:
.
“No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.”
.
It is this investigator’s opinion that Mark Jeftovic’s easyDNS.com, as Internet service provider and host for allegedly defamatory material, did knowingly and actively subject Mr. Andy Lehrer to ongoing personal injury in the form of defamation, and that their inaction with respect to investigating, and terminating the services causing Mr.  Lahrer’s injuries, constitutes active conspiracy with, and furtherance of the antagonist’s word-crimes.
.

But, there are also kudos for Mark Jeftovic of easyDNS.com:

.

WikiLeaks_logoIssue is taken above because, in my opinion, the ongoing publication of the alleged defamation against Andy Lehrer does not serve the public interest. It would be remiss of me not to also point out a balancing praiseworthy decision made by Mark Jeftovic of easyDNS.com. Namely, his decision to help enable the ongoing availability of WikiLeaks after one of his competitors pulled the plug on the site. No doubt, this decision is supported by many, including myself, who see the benefits of intense scrutiny of secrets that work against humanity’s best interests, and it will also be condemned by those who have deeply held superstitions about the trustworthiness of the authorities to make decisions on our behalf.
.
The original Lehrer post, as captured 26 June, 2015 is below, this is republished under the fair use copyright doctrine for criticism, education etc:
Screen Shot 2015-07-26 at 10.36.47 am