BADFORPEOPLE

Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

TechniTrader Reviews Response to Online Complaints

In Uncategorized on March 13, 2017 at 12:42 am

TechniTrader Reviews the online Complaints against the firm

If you searched the internet for TechniTrader reviews and info on their trading and investing education business, you may have seen a few negative and defaming TechniTrader reviews. TechniTrader takes great pleasure in the education programs they provide and that’s why the company decided to share their side of the story.

The firm regularly investigates libellous TechniTrader reviews and have already responded to some of the negative reviews to explain that certain issue. Several of TechniTrader’s pupils also provided a response to some of the defaming TechniTrader reviews by sharing their genuine view on the TechniTrader programs.

Since 1998, TechniTrader received an A+ rating with the Better Business Bureau. The company always responded quickly and thoroughly to formally submitted complaints and always have been able to settle a legitimate request.

TechniTrader’s # 1 goal is to provide top quality stock market schooling. TechniTrader continuously reviews and updates their programs to keep up with shifts in the stock market and other relevant markets. The company works individually with their pupils to help them establish their own trading strategy. This guidance is continuous and there is no time limit for getting training support when you need it.

TechniTrader does not only offer comprehensive schooling on the stock market and numerous strategies of trading in their main course called the ‘Methodology Essentials Course’. They also provide a committed assistance network, which the student reviews represent as well.

We want to encourage everyone to do their own research when they encounter negative TechniTrader reviews. We are confident that when you examine our services, how we do business and who we are, you will see that there is not a more qualified stock market education company. Thank you for taking the time to read this TechniTrader review.

 

DRAFT OPEN LETTER

In Uncategorized on March 6, 2017 at 5:40 am

OPEN LETTER: [organisation] of [LOCATION] [CATEGORY] – Malicious Reviews & False Complaints
|

OPEN LETTER: [organisation] of [LOCATION] [CATEGORY] – False Complaints and Malicious Reviews

|

Re: Offer of free help to restore your damaged online reputation caused by false customer reviews against [organisation] of [LOCATION] ([ CATEGORY]

|

To: The CEO of [organisation] of [LOCATION]

| You are probably painfully aware of damaging Google search results for” [organisation] of [LOCATION]. Almost all of the websites that are hosting these attacks against [organisation] have been, for the most part, found to be not credible. Hence, they are causing you considerable damage by way of lost opportunities when prospective customers research [organisation] Some metrics that are especially relevant to your problem, are expressed in this infographic titled Alarming Statistics on the damage Google results can do to you or your business reputation

FREE HELP for [organisation]

Because you have need in this area, our team of volunteer experts in Online Reputation Management is at your service. Consequently, we have published many free help resources to help hide these problem Google searches for [organisation] They are available here:
www.Defamation911.org

PROFESSIONAL ASSISTANCE for [organisation]

In addition to the free help linked above, the same team offers professional fee-based consulting if you can not manage the problem internally:

Click to Display [organisation]’s Problem Google Search Results

Sincerely,
The Defamation911.org
& Page1.me teams

Open Letter to [organisation] of [LOCATION] [CATEGORY]

|TAGS: Reviews, Complaints, [organisation], [LOCATION],
|Keywords: [organisation], [LOCATION], Complaints, Reviews,.
|Description: [organisation] of [LOCATION] is struggling with fake customer complaints that appear of Page 1 of Google Search. This is common for [CATEGORY] vendors, but the problem can be overcome.
|URL.

Question for #Integrity20

In Uncategorized on October 25, 2016 at 2:14 am

CONTEXT: Amit Singhal, Google Senior VP, characterized Google as “…the biggest kingmaker on this Earth”. To a growing number of people “Google IS the Internet”, and if google says so, then so it is, even though its search algorithms are proprietary deployed at Googles good pleasure.

QUESTION: Should Google’s ability to effect mass changes to the “cognitive mapping” of the world for political, social and moral values be checked by watchdogs at national or international levels?

Jodat Law Group Reviews and Tips for Responding to Internet Harassment

In Uncategorized on September 8, 2016 at 4:27 am

Jodat Law Group Reviews and gives Suggestions for Surviving Online Attacks

Submitted by: Jodat Law Group

Jodat Law Group: Sarasota / Bradenton Personal Injury Lawyers
Jodat Law Group Reviews – Bradenton, Sarasota, Venice
Jodat Law Group, PA | Facebook
Jodat Law Group, P.A. | LinkedIn
Jodat Law Group Reviews | CrunchBase
Jodat Law Group Reviews | Youtube
Jodat Law Group Reviews – Video Dailymotion

Google Search Result Pages often display high-ranking lies that damage businesses and employment opportunities, here are some tips on fixing these problematic Google search results.

STEP # 1: BACK OUT! AVOID A FLAME WAR

Jodat Law Group reviews and gives Tips for Handling Digital Attacks

Jodat Law Group reviews and gives Tips for Handling Digital Attacks

Should you detect a spurious gripe submitted about you and your firm, it is O.K. to provide a compelling defense at once, nevertheless always keep it polite. The libels facing you are a type of emotional combat; you will most likely win or lose the minds of your would-be clients, depending on how you interact. BEAR IN MIND: Issue ONLY one rebuttal on the actual gripe site, if you keep updating it, then the problem complaint will certainly attain elevated Google.com positions. Fear not, you can easily show the audience that the absence of other responses is not verification of guilt, by opening up your one-time answer with something like the following:

“I will not take part in an open-ended debate on this web page, it will only stimulate even more hatred by my antagonist (or other fitting description). Notwithstanding, I respectfully tender this single answer for the sake of my clients’ consideration”

STEP # 2: BE CAREFUL HOW YOU POST A REBUTTAL

  1. DO NOT reply to older complaints on the complaint site, or you can just increase its Google rank, Google likes dispute, & cedes extra value to perpetual quarrels. It is best to let ancient articles pass away.
  2. DO NOT be inordinately defensive, do you remember Shakespeare: “The lady doth protest too much, methinks” that is a quote from the 1600 stage play Hamlet.This has been plied as a figure of speech, to point out someone’s eager and frequent endeavors to convince others of some concern, in so doing making him or herself look defensive and evasive.
  3. DON’T mention your opponent. Draw on 3rd person descriptions like “he” or “she”. Or else, you’ll probably anger these people further. More importantly, it appears cheesy and ruthless to the audience. Forbearance = Class.
  4. DO POST good material in relation to you and your corporation, occasionally the only quick fix for deleterious speech is even more speech. In the event that you don’t take charge of Google’s search engine results page for your full name, other people probably will, with or without your guidance, and it will likely end badly if he does not fancy you. If you have not posted much in the way of relevant, concise material about yourself, then Google will have no choice but to present the diatribe furnished by others, including those who don’t like you and your family.

STEP # 3: GET SUPPORT WITH DO IT YOURSELF GUIDES TO PREPARING YOUR INTERNET CREDIBILITY AND REPUTATION PICKLE

  1. A group of professional online reputation management masters has happily given up their wisdom and tips, to this free help site namely Defamation911.org
  2. This volunteer group maintains a freebie suggestion blog site at www.blog.page1.me
  3. The Facebook page is https://www.facebook.com/defamation911/

STEP # 4: SECURE PROFESSIONAL ONLINE REPUTATION MANAGEMENT HELP IF YOUR ISSUE JUSTIFIES THE PRICE

Fee Based Online Reputation Repair firms are increasing, by virtue of Google’s search program, which seems to mysteriously offer at the very least, 1 damaging search engine result, for the majority of businesses and entrepreneurs.

BUT BE CAREFUL!

You may have received SPAM emails from Lots of vendors are based in developing regions. Unfortunately, some make the most of frantic, hurting persons, searching for a quick fix for the damages being a result of their digital reputation dilemmas. Carry out due diligence, check that the specialists you retain write in your native lingo and that they provide verified documentation about who they are, and precisely where they are located.

STEP # 5: REFRAIN FROM USING IT IF YOU CAN – BUT GOING TO COURT MIGHT BE THE ONLY WAY YOU CAN GET RELIEF.

“I’ll sue you!” is quite often the initial response from a person unjustly dishonored by online defamation. Regardless, this sort of decision most likely carries with it significant emotional weariness and misery. It is very important that you sit down, and meticulously the emotional and financial consequences before opening that particular can of worms.

If you do opt to file proceedings against your critic, take into consideration NOT pursuing monetary damages; if so the case will be less challenging. If your primary goal is the elimination of the denigrative search engine result, then you might just pursue (1) Declaratory Relief and (2) Injunctive Relief. Although declaratory relief is only a notice by the Law Court, that a specific thing is or is not so. For example, if in your proceedings you ask the judge to proclaim that the online claims made against you are incorrect, he or she will, hopefully, deliver findings to that tone. For these reasons, the court could very well also order that the detracting contents be removed from public view by the defendant. If the publisher protests, then in many cases various of the internet search engines will recognize the objective of the ruling, findings, and mandates, and erase the relevant data from their respective search indexes. That way, even when the libelous material remains within the original internet site, in effect, if it is not displayed in search engines, it may as well not exist, as it is extremely unlikely anyone will encounter it. Ergo, your intention of solving the ongoing credibility and reputation destruction will have been reached.

If your antagonist sees that the anguish that he or she caused you has been deleted, then the personal attack may start again, that being the case you could go back to court and request the court to provide subsequent injunctions. However ideally, the initial directives will incorporate language that controls additional instances of substantially similar allegations.

 

Protected: Justin Moers’ Ideas for Coping With Internet Defamation

In Uncategorized on September 7, 2016 at 7:17 am

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

Clyde Cadiddlehopper’s Recommendations for Handling Online Slander Campaigns

In Uncategorized on June 27, 2016 at 5:21 am

Clyde Cadiddlehopper’s Guide for Surviving Web Based Defamation

Clyde Cadiddlehopper has been tackling a destructive, remorseless, online libel attack. Clyde Cadiddlehopper’s adversary has targeted him as well as his corporation, without any justification, and indicated him in some horrible concerns that don’t need repeating.

Even so, Clyde has discovered a lot from this test, & has graciously permitted our team to post this circumspection openly so that you, the reader, will be far better trained, when incurring the hatefulness of a web-based troll, as Clyde has.

STEP # 1: BACK OFF! DO NOT FEED THE TROLLS

Whenever you see a fallacious gripe posted about you and your business, it is alright to upload a convincing defense asap, but keep it modest. The slanders facing you are a kind of emotional war; you may win or lose the minds of your future clients, depending on how you respond. BEAR IN MIND: Only issue one counterclaim on the actual gripe website page, if you don’t the article will likely build up greater Search engine positions. You can easily explain to the viewers that the absence of subsequent replies isn’t verification of guilt, by starting your single response with something like the following:

“I will not interact in an extended argument on this website, it will likely whip up even more ridicule by my antagonist (or other appropriate portrayal). But, I respectfully put forward this one-time answer for the interest of my clienteles’ assurance.”

STEP # 2: CAREFULLY CRAFT YOUR RESPONSE

  1. DO NOT answer old articles on the gripe site (“necroposting”), this will just increase their Google ranking, Google.com thrives with debate, and bestows further ranking to ongoing dialogues. You should just leave aged pages as they are.
  2. Don’t be overly defensive. Remember Shakespeare: “The lady doth protest too much, methinks” which is an excerpt from the 1600 stage performance Hamlet.
    It’s applied as a figure of speech, in a range of styles, to call out someone’s vehement and frequent strivings to persuade some others of some concern, as a result making him or herself seem defensive, and hollow.
  3. DON’T name your antagonist. Put to use third person descriptions such as “he” or “she”. If you don’t, you will simply aggravate him or her even more. Furthermore, it seems sleazy and ruthless to the visitors. Coolness = Elegance.
  4. DO POST beneficial blogs & posts about you or your organization, in some cases, the only remedy for serious discourse, is much more chatter. If you do not take charge of Google’s search results page for your good name, somebody else may, with or without your consent, and it will most likely finish terribly if that person doesn’t approve of you. If you have not published much of useful, concise material about yourself, then Google has nothing to rank about you, except the garbage supplied by others, including those who may not like you and your livelihood.

STEP # 3: GET SUPPORT WITH DO-IT-YOURSELF HANDBOOK TO RESTORING YOUR WEB-BASED CREDIBILITY OBSTACLES

  1. A group of dedicated online reputation management gurus have generously given way their experience and methodologies, to a non-profit site namely Defamation911.org
  2. That same team keeps a complimentary strategy internet site at www.blog.page1.me
  3. The Facebook page is https://www.facebook.com/defamation911/

STEP # 4: FIND HIGH QUALITY ONLINE REPUTATION MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE IF YOUR ISSUE WARRANTS THE CHARGES

Fee-Based Online Reputation Repair operations are expanding, owing to Google’s search program, which seems mysteriously to provide a minimum of 1 bad search engine result, for many corporations and entrepreneurs.

HOWEVER, BE CAREFUL!

There are countless services based in developing nations, who take advantage of desperate, injured consumers, searching for immediate help for the injury triggered by their Internet reputation difficulties. Perform due diligence, make certain that the practitioners you hire write in your native tongue and furnish complete transparency about who they are, and the place where they are based.

STEP # 5: REFRAIN FROM IT IF POSSIBLE – BUT LAW SUIT MIGHT BE THE BEST OPTION.

“I’ll sue you!” is quite often the number one response from an individual unjustly marred by online defamation. Regardless, such response typically brings along with it great psychological and mental exhaustion and misery. It is important that you relax, and very carefully count the financial and emotional consequences before opening that particular can of worms.

If you decide to enter a personal injury lawsuit against your detractor, think about NOT pursuing financial damages; if so the litigation will be less complicated. If your primary ambition is the removal of the injurious Google results, then you may very well merely ask for (1) Declaratory Relief and (2) Injunctive Relief. While, declaratory relief is only an affirmation by the Judge, which something is or is not so. As an example, if you ask the judge to certify that the internet accusations made against you are contrary to fact, he or she will, we hope, announce conclusions to that tone. Consequently, the judge would probably likewise order that the defamatory materials be blotted out from public view by the antagonist. If the publisher dissents, then in most cases every of the search engines will most likely observe the intent of the judgment, findings, and directives, and sanitize the offending content from their particular search indexes. By doing this, even if the injurious text remains on the problem internet site, the fact remains that, if it isn’t listed in search engines, it may as well not exist, as it is unlikely people will see it. As such, your goal of alleviating the open-ended credibility and reputation problem will have been reached.

If your adversary realizes that the torment that he or she has been causing you is erased, then the defamation could begin again if so you may return to the judge and request the judge to issue succeeding orders. But ideally, the initial directives will consist of language that limits future instances of similar claims.

HALF-COCKED: Dr Andrés Guadamuz of University of Sussex Technollama Blunder

In Academic Ethics & Breaches, Entitlement Disorders, Poor Education, Uncategorized on February 22, 2016 at 11:30 pm

The Impulsive Folly of Prof. Andrés Guadamuz of Technollama

UPDATE: 12 Mar 2016  Dr. Janice Duffy responds to Prof. Guadamuz’s punditry

Technollama's DR Andréa Guadamuz reveals his true nature in a heartless commentary about a bullying survivor.Dr Andrés Guadamuz, a senior lecturer in intellectual property law for University of Sussex has picked a fight without really thinking about the consequences. In a series of  actions that can only be described as “drive-by punditry”, in this era of poor impulse control, and tweeting or blogging before the brain is in gear, Andrés Guadamuz may become the poster child for this new phenomena.

People who have problems thinking before tweeting, are much like angry drivers who think that no one they know is looking, their poor impulse control can reveal their true nature. Reasonable people will often concede to a more aggressive driver, not because they are weak, but because they are wise. Likewise, those who struggle with mental conditions such as inflated ego, entitlement complexes, and narcissistic or sociopathic personality disorders, will often manifest in traffic in disturbing ways. So too with ignorant and arrogant social networking users who tweet half-cocked.

Technollama Endangered Species - Dr Andres Guadamuz of University of Sussex

Technollama Endangered Species – Dr Andres Guadamuz of University of Sussex finds out what happens when a Llama kicks a Tiger in the Tail.

The full account of the rants of Technollama’s Dr Andres Guadamuz, of University of Sussex, and the subsequent justification of his actions, are detailed by the fellow academic he attacked, Dr Janice Duffy, in here Authorized Statement in response to his punditry.

Test Search Title Extension FFFGDDRT

In Uncategorized on February 10, 2016 at 2:27 am

Test Search Title Extension FFFGDDRT

SCAM ALERT! Joseph Grossi of Renewed Solution RenewedSolution.com

In Uncategorized on December 18, 2015 at 9:59 pm
SCAM ALERT! Joseph Grossi of Renewed Solution RenewedSolution.com Germany

SCAM ALERT! Joseph Grossi of Renewed Solution RenewedSolution.com Germany

Fake name Joe Grossi is part of a sophisticated romance scammers operating on German dating site Elite Partner: Joseph Grossi of “Renewed Solution” and other fake businesses with basic websites are frauds. Joe is operating out of Lisbon Portugal. There have been similar stories to other fake profiles operated by these scammers, and their fake companies. Those fake company websites have now been taken down thanks to our activism.

ROMANCE FRAUD! Renewed Solution CEO Joseph Grossi is not Real – Joe Grossi RenewedSolution.com

Joe Grossi was born in Germany, grew up in the USA, and recently moved back to Germany to establish a renewable energy company following the death/divorce of his wife

These pictures of Joseph Grossi are in fact a stolen pictures which have been associated with numerous scams on the web.

Because the face of the scammer does not match the photo. This is why he will NEVER do a video calls with their targets.

If you are already communicating with “Joseph”, then DO NOT SEND HIM MONEY when he thinks you trust him, they will spend several months of months “grooming” you before asking for money.

If you are in contact with this individual, please contact us through the Romance Scam Victim Help Request form below.
[wufoo username=”rexxyfree” formhash=”q9osppo1gc57q9″ autoresize=”true” height=”1139″ header=”show” ssl=”true”]
[wufoo username=”iil1llll111lll1i1ill1iiil1l1ii” formhash=”xw2c86c1r3s9hc” autoresize=”true” height=”403″ header=”show” ssl=”true”]

James Petulla: Is Higher Education A Ripoff?

In Bad Customer Service Experiences, Internet defamation, Online Defamation Rebuttal, Redacted Revolt, Uncategorized on October 24, 2015 at 6:48 pm
James Petulla

James Petulla. CEO Recording Radio Film Connection

James Petulla did not start out to be an educator. Back in the mid-80s, after working for a few months with the Columbia School of Broadcasting in his capacity as a San Jose radio DJ, he realized that CSB was not doing their students any favors. As Petulla stated, “They were ripping off their students. The textbooks were ancient, the equipment outdated, and their teachers out of touch.”

James presented a mentor/apprentice concept of education to the Columbia School of Broadcasting because he knew it would work to prepare students for a career in broadcasting. His plan was rejected as being unworkable and logistically unsound. Undeterred, James decided to start his own business, offering mentoring services to radio broadcasting students in the San Jose area.

Fast forward 30 years and James Petulla is the CEO of Radio Recording Film Connection which offers mentor apprenticeships in radio broadcasting, music recording and film directing and producing. Industry veterans have flocked to the concept, allowing the company to have professional mentors in all 50 states.
Along the way, James Petulla has never lost sight of his original premise: the mentor/apprentice model of education is fundamentally a better approach to education if the desired result upon graduation is to have a career. “Students are not only learning the ropes from working industry professionals, they are doing so in their mentor’s place of business—a recording studio, a radio station, a film production company—so they are constantly being exposed to how business gets done in the real world. You simply can’t duplicate this environment on a school campus. Additionally, because student apprentices work on their mentor’s projects they are interacting with clients, producers, directors, DJs and other industry professionals and this allows them to network within the industry. Essentially, our programs place our students inside the music, film and radio industries which is a huge advantage.”

There’s another fundamental difference in the approach of Radio Recording Film Connection, as defined by James Petulla, and other trade schools and colleges. “Most schools are driven by how many of their students graduate—that’s their end game. At Radio Recording Film Connection, our goal is to get as many of our graduates employment as possible. Right now we’re approaching 80% success rate in this goal—almost 80% of our graduates find meaningful employment within the industry within six months of graduation.”

This is more than just lip service. Radio Recording Film Connection has a dedicated Job Placement department that starts working with the student from their first lesson up until a year after they graduate. Their duties include unlimited free tutoring, help with resumes and interviews, as well as matching students with job openings as they come up. The results speak for themselves.

Another fact that James Petulla is particularly proud of is the low tuition charged by Radio Recording Film Connection. “What good does it do the student to graduate from a trade school with $30,000 to $100,000 in permanent student debt obligations? Debts kill dreams. We work very hard to keep our tuition low—almost all of our programs are priced at less than $10,000.”

When asked to reflect on his journey, Petulla responds, “If you asked me 30 years ago where I’d be today I probably would have said I see myself being a successful disc jockey like a Howard Stern. Today, I’m grateful for the path I ended up taking. I’m privileged to be a part of a process where we are helping future Howard Sterns reach their potential.”