BADFORPEOPLE

Archive for the ‘Internet defamation’ Category

ETHICS ALERT: Before You Interview With Daniel Glick Journalist, Beware of The Story Group…

In Internet defamation, Uncategorized on May 10, 2013 at 6:40 am

Disgraced Journalist Daniel Glick of “The Story Group”

If you are considering agreeing to an interview with Journalist Daniel Glick of The Story Group; you might like to read this exposé which explains how one man suffered catastrophic damage to his reputation, business, and personal relationships as a result of fallacious journalism on the part of Daniel Glick. The brief account explains how Glick used numerous categories of fallacious arguments such as strawman, appeal to ignorance and ad hominem to set up his target.

It began with a dishonest pretext with the initial interview request, feigning a brotherhood type experience by explaining how his wife left him and his children to pursue a lesbian relationship. It is unknown if this pretext is true or false, but it was a particularly despicable pretext used to ingratiate himself in the family of his hatchet piece victim. Daniel Glick actually ate some of his victim’s daughter’s birthday cake in their presence.

Many of the false light twisting of small truths that were in and of themselves benign, and then peppering his final story with a convoluted web of lies that leaves the reader unable to draw accurate conclusions (argument through verbosity).

This active desperate journalism has subsequently called into question all of the work that Daniel Glick is done over the past few years in relation to the cold case murder of Scott Johnson in Australia in 1988. it should be noted that just because Glick has been caught lying in his most recent story, it does not mean that the work he has done for the cold case murder is also fallacious. However, if one cannot be trusted in small things, neither can they be trusted in the big things. This is where his tangled web of lies casts a sad shadow over his entire career’s work.

Search for Daniel Glick journalistic ethics warning

ETHICS ALERT: Before You Contact Perry Chiaramonte the Fox News Journalist….

In Fox News Ethics, Internet defamation on December 23, 2012 at 10:42 am
Ethics Questioned of Perry Chiaramonte Fox News Journalist Previously of the New York Post

Disgraced Journalist Perry Chiaramonte Fox News Previously of the New York Post

If you are considering agreeing to an interview with Fox News Journalist Perry Chiaramonte, you might like to take about 6-minutes to view this brief video which explains how one man suffered catastrophic damage to his reputation, business, and personal relationships as a result of fallacious journalism on the part of Perry Chiaramonte. The brief account explains how Perry used numerous categories of fallacious arguments such as strawman, appeal to ignorance and ad hominem to set up his target. It began with a dishonest pretext with the initial interview request, false light twisting of small truths that were in and of themselves benign, and then peppering his final story with a convoluted web of lies that lets the reader unable to draw accurate conclusions.

Search for Perry Chiaramonte ethics alerts

JOURNALISTIC ETHICS ALERT Perry Chiaramonte of Fox News & New York Post

 

Darren Meade (Allegedly) Commits Fraudulent Copyright Notice Crime

In Darren Meade Watch, Internet defamation on April 18, 2012 at 6:46 pm

§ 506. Criminal offenses4

(a) Criminal Infringement. —

(1) In general. — Any person who willfully infringes a copyright shall be punished as provided under section 2319 of title 18, if the infringement was committed —

(c) Fraudulent Copyright Notice. — Any person who, with fraudulent intent, places on any article a notice of copyright or words of the same purport that such person knows to be false, or who, with fraudulent intent, publicly distributes or imports for public distribution any article bearing such notice or words that such person knows to be false, shall be fined not more than $2,500.

CAVEAT: The accused is naturally innocent until proven guilty. A Plausible defense might be that a third party impersonated Darren Meade or his company Kairos-Meade.

Apparently, Darren Meade committed a crime with a fraudulent copyright notice

Apparently, Darren Meade committed a crime with a fraudulent copyright notice. YouTube removed a damaging video that revealed Darren Meade's gleeful description of the pain he was inflicting on a smear campaign target.

The copyright owner of the video referenced above is unknown, but we have our suspicions. Notwithstanding, if Darren Meade through his company “Kairos-Meade” did successfully have the video removed from YouTube under copyright violation notice, then he has committed a crime.