BADFORPEOPLE

Archive for June, 2016|Monthly archive page

Chad Chiniquy ’s Recommendations for Surviving Web Based Harassment

In Internet Defamation Victims List on June 29, 2016 at 12:44 am

Chad Chiniquy ‘s Tips for Managing Internet Attacks

Chad_Chiniquy_Slander_Response_BFP

Chad Chiniquy’s antagonist has targeted him with no reason and accused him of repulsive things. However, Chad Chiniquy has discovered a great deal from the journey and graciously made it possible for us to publish this understanding openly so that you, the reader, may be best informed when incurring the indignation of an online crazy-maker, as Chad Chiniquy has.

Chad Chiniquy has been battling a ferocious, cyber libel attack.

Chad Chiniquy ‘s attacker is intent on destroying him as well as his company, with no reason, and indicated him in some unfounded allegations that don’t merit repeating.

Even so, Chad Chiniquy has learned a great deal from the ordeal, and generously consented to us to yield these methods publicly so that you, the reader, can be a lot better trained, when subjected to the fury of an online troll, as Chad has.

Contact Chad Chiniquy

Chad Chiniquy | LinkedIn
Chad Chiniquy | Youtube
Chad Chiniquy | Facebook
Company | Find, Fund and Flip Systems
Chad’s Real Estate Seminars 

STEP # 1: DISENGAGE! AVOID A FLAME WAR

If you spot a fake complaint submitted against you and your business, it is fine to post a strong rebuttal immediately, nevertheless try to keep it deferential. The calumnies against you are a variety of emotional war; you will most likely win or lose the minds of your would-be customers, depending on how you respond. BEAR IN MIND: Just issue one defense on the actual gripe internet page, or else the damaging accusations can gain increased Search engine standings. You are able to indicate to the viewers that the lack of successive replies is not proof of guilt, by beginning your one-time reply with something similar to this:

“I will not engage an extended argument on this site, it will merely ignite more malice by my detractor (or other pertinent portrayal). However, I do respectfully submit this single response for the interest of my patrons’ consideration.”

STEP # 2: BE CAREFUL HOW YOU REPLY

  1. DO NOT act in response to older complaints on the problem page, this will only spike the search engine ranking, Google thrives on debate, and our tests indicate that it grants further weight to on-going controversies. Just leave old posts to expire.
  2. DO NOT be excessively defensive, consider Shakespeare: “The lady doth protest too much, methinks” that is an excerpt from the 1599 theater play Hamlet. This has been applied in a manner of speaking, in a variety of phrasings, to portray someone’s frantic and too frequent endeavors to convince the public of something, and thus making him or herself look defensive and two-faced.
  3. DON’T mention your accuser. Utilize third person terms such as “he” or “she”. Otherwise, you’ll likely anger them further. More to the point, it seems vindictive and trashy to the readers. Restraint = Classy.
  4. Continue to publish more beneficial information touching on you or your business enterprise, every once in awhile the only antidote for deleterious speech, is much more chatter. If you don’t have command of Google’s search results page for your full name, someone else will, with or without your permission, and it will certainly end terribly if she doesn’t fancy you. If you haven’t posted a lot of useful, concise articles about yourself, then Google has no choice but to present the garbage generated by others, including those who despise you and your family.

STEP # 3: GET FREE HELP WITH DO IT YOURSELF GUIDES TO CURING YOUR WEB-BASED REPUTATION PICKLE

  1. A team of professional online reputation management masters has happily entrusted their experience and processes, to this charitable online resource called Defamation911.org
  2. The very same crew keeps a complimentary information internet site at www.blog.page1.me
  3. Their Facebook page is https://www.facebook.com/defamation911/

STEP # 4: OBTAIN EXPERIENCED ONLINE REPUTATION MANAGEMENT AID IF THE ISSUE WARRANTS THE CHARGES

Fee-Based Online Reputation Repair operations are expanding since Google seems to provide at least one impugning search result, for a large number of ventures and entrepreneurs.

HOWEVER, BE CAREFUL!

SPAM email comes from ORM Services based in developing regions, some capitalize on desperate, distressed people, searching for immediate help for the hardship being a result of their digital reputation quandaries. Do your reference checks, verify that the experts you contract share your native vernacular, and provide verified documentation about who they are, and specifically where they run their operation.

STEP # 5: REFRAIN FROM IT IF YOU CAN – BUT JUDICIAL PROCEEDING MAY BE THE FASTEST FIX.

“I’ll sue you!” is oftentimes the first reaction from a person unjustly marred by online defamation. Even so, this type of response typically brings with it significant emotional debilitation and misery. It is essential that you sit down, and the financial and emotional toll before opening up such a can of worms.

Online_Defamation_010If you do choose to enter a lawsuit against your detractor, think about NOT seeking monetary damages; as the case will be much less challenging. If your primary ambition is the removal of the defamatory Google results, then you can simply look for (1) Declaratory Relief and (2) Injunctive Relief. While, declaratory relief is only a statement by the Court/Judge, that one thing is or is not so. As an example, if in your case you ask the bench to pronounce that the web-based accusations made against you are fake, he or she will, we hope, declare conclusions to that tone. Which means that, the judge will likely likewise order that the libelous contents be eliminated from public view by the author. If the blogger protests, then in many cases every of the online search engines will most likely observe the intent of the ruling, conclusions, and decrees, and get rid of the offending content from their respective search indexes. In this way, despite the fact that the libelous content continues inside the original website, in effect, if it doesn’t show in Google, it is extremely unlikely people will discover it. Ergo, your goal of rectifying the growing brand injury will have been reached.

If your defamer sees that the injury he or she has been causing you has been deleted, then the malicious defamation might begin all over again, that being the case you could go back to court and request the court to issue other orders. But ideally, the first directives will contain language that regulates future publishing of similar allegations.

Clyde Cadiddlehopper’s Recommendations for Handling Online Slander Campaigns

In Uncategorized on June 27, 2016 at 5:21 am

Clyde Cadiddlehopper’s Guide for Surviving Web Based Defamation

Clyde Cadiddlehopper has been tackling a destructive, remorseless, online libel attack. Clyde Cadiddlehopper’s adversary has targeted him as well as his corporation, without any justification, and indicated him in some horrible concerns that don’t need repeating.

Even so, Clyde has discovered a lot from this test, & has graciously permitted our team to post this circumspection openly so that you, the reader, will be far better trained, when incurring the hatefulness of a web-based troll, as Clyde has.

STEP # 1: BACK OFF! DO NOT FEED THE TROLLS

Whenever you see a fallacious gripe posted about you and your business, it is alright to upload a convincing defense asap, but keep it modest. The slanders facing you are a kind of emotional war; you may win or lose the minds of your future clients, depending on how you respond. BEAR IN MIND: Only issue one counterclaim on the actual gripe website page, if you don’t the article will likely build up greater Search engine positions. You can easily explain to the viewers that the absence of subsequent replies isn’t verification of guilt, by starting your single response with something like the following:

“I will not interact in an extended argument on this website, it will likely whip up even more ridicule by my antagonist (or other appropriate portrayal). But, I respectfully put forward this one-time answer for the interest of my clienteles’ assurance.”

STEP # 2: CAREFULLY CRAFT YOUR RESPONSE

  1. DO NOT answer old articles on the gripe site (“necroposting”), this will just increase their Google ranking, Google.com thrives with debate, and bestows further ranking to ongoing dialogues. You should just leave aged pages as they are.
  2. Don’t be overly defensive. Remember Shakespeare: “The lady doth protest too much, methinks” which is an excerpt from the 1600 stage performance Hamlet.
    It’s applied as a figure of speech, in a range of styles, to call out someone’s vehement and frequent strivings to persuade some others of some concern, as a result making him or herself seem defensive, and hollow.
  3. DON’T name your antagonist. Put to use third person descriptions such as “he” or “she”. If you don’t, you will simply aggravate him or her even more. Furthermore, it seems sleazy and ruthless to the visitors. Coolness = Elegance.
  4. DO POST beneficial blogs & posts about you or your organization, in some cases, the only remedy for serious discourse, is much more chatter. If you do not take charge of Google’s search results page for your good name, somebody else may, with or without your consent, and it will most likely finish terribly if that person doesn’t approve of you. If you have not published much of useful, concise material about yourself, then Google has nothing to rank about you, except the garbage supplied by others, including those who may not like you and your livelihood.

STEP # 3: GET SUPPORT WITH DO-IT-YOURSELF HANDBOOK TO RESTORING YOUR WEB-BASED CREDIBILITY OBSTACLES

  1. A group of dedicated online reputation management gurus have generously given way their experience and methodologies, to a non-profit site namely Defamation911.org
  2. That same team keeps a complimentary strategy internet site at www.blog.page1.me
  3. The Facebook page is https://www.facebook.com/defamation911/

STEP # 4: FIND HIGH QUALITY ONLINE REPUTATION MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE IF YOUR ISSUE WARRANTS THE CHARGES

Fee-Based Online Reputation Repair operations are expanding, owing to Google’s search program, which seems mysteriously to provide a minimum of 1 bad search engine result, for many corporations and entrepreneurs.

HOWEVER, BE CAREFUL!

There are countless services based in developing nations, who take advantage of desperate, injured consumers, searching for immediate help for the injury triggered by their Internet reputation difficulties. Perform due diligence, make certain that the practitioners you hire write in your native tongue and furnish complete transparency about who they are, and the place where they are based.

STEP # 5: REFRAIN FROM IT IF POSSIBLE – BUT LAW SUIT MIGHT BE THE BEST OPTION.

“I’ll sue you!” is quite often the number one response from an individual unjustly marred by online defamation. Regardless, such response typically brings along with it great psychological and mental exhaustion and misery. It is important that you relax, and very carefully count the financial and emotional consequences before opening that particular can of worms.

If you decide to enter a personal injury lawsuit against your detractor, think about NOT pursuing financial damages; if so the litigation will be less complicated. If your primary ambition is the removal of the injurious Google results, then you may very well merely ask for (1) Declaratory Relief and (2) Injunctive Relief. While, declaratory relief is only an affirmation by the Judge, which something is or is not so. As an example, if you ask the judge to certify that the internet accusations made against you are contrary to fact, he or she will, we hope, announce conclusions to that tone. Consequently, the judge would probably likewise order that the defamatory materials be blotted out from public view by the antagonist. If the publisher dissents, then in most cases every of the search engines will most likely observe the intent of the judgment, findings, and directives, and sanitize the offending content from their particular search indexes. By doing this, even if the injurious text remains on the problem internet site, the fact remains that, if it isn’t listed in search engines, it may as well not exist, as it is unlikely people will see it. As such, your goal of alleviating the open-ended credibility and reputation problem will have been reached.

If your adversary realizes that the torment that he or she has been causing you is erased, then the defamation could begin again if so you may return to the judge and request the judge to issue succeeding orders. But ideally, the initial directives will consist of language that limits future instances of similar claims.

Claudia Della Mora ‘s Tips for Dealing With Internet Smear Campaigns – Black Legend Capital

In Internet Defamation Victims List on June 26, 2016 at 1:44 pm

Claudia Della Mora’s Tips and Advice for Surviving Web Based Libel – Black Legend Capital

Claudia Della Mora's protagonist has targeted her & her corporation, without cause, and accused her of shameful acts that do not warrant repeating. However, Claudia Della Mora has learned much from the ordeal, and has graciously authorized our team to post these ideas openly so that others, may be prepared, when incurring the fury of a web based assault, as Claudia Della Mora has.

Claudia Della Mora’s protagonist has targeted her & her corporation, without cause, and accused her of shameful acts that do not warrant repeating.
However, Claudia Della Mora has learned much from the ordeal, and has graciously authorized our team to post these ideas openly so that others may be prepared, when incurring the fury of a web based assault, as Claudia Della Mora has.

Claudia Della Mora has been dealing with a spiteful, remorseless, Internet smear campaign. Ms. Mora’s protagonist was intent on destroying her, along with her company, without validation, and implicated her is some unfounded assertions that do not need restating. Despite this, Claudia Della Mora has discovered a great deal from the episode, and generously authorized us to distribute this knowledge freely in order that other victims, could be better trained, should you ever incur the fury of an internet-based assault, as Claudia Della Mora has.

Connect with Claudia Della Mora

Claudia Della Mora| LinkedIn
Claudia Della Mora| Youtube
Claudia Della Mora| Facebook
Black Legend Capital

STEP # 1: BACK OUT! AVOID A FLAME WAR

If you notice a bogus accusation posted against you and your organization, it is O.K. to respond with a convincing counterargument instantly, however keep it respectful. The abuses against you are a kind of intellectual war; you are going to win or lose the hearts of your hoped-for patrons, depending on how you answer back. TAKE NOTE: Only post one rebuttal on the actual attack web site, or else the web page will certainly attain elevated Search engine positions. You might show the audience that the lack of successive responses is not confirmation of guilt, by starting your single reply with something along these lines:

“I will not take part in an extended argument on this web site, it will simply stir even more hatred from my stalker (or other pertinent summary). However, I do respectfully publish this one-time reply for the sake of my clienteles’ peace of mind”

STEP # 2: CAREFULLY PLAN YOUR REBUTTAL

  1. DO NOT act in response to older articles on the problem page (“necroposting”), doing so will just raise its search engine positioning, Google fancies conflict, and our research suggests grants further ranking to prolonged rants. It is best to leave ancient pages pass away.
  2. DO NOT be overly defensive, consider Shakespeare: “The lady doth protest too much, methinks” which is an excerpt from the 1599 theater play Hamlet.This is used as a manner of speaking, in a number of expressions, to portray someone’s too frequent and vehement endeavours to persuade other people of some matter, consequently making themselves seem defensive, and phony.
  3. DO NOT name your foe. Utilise third person descriptions like “he” or “she”. Otherwise, you will just infuriate them further. More importantly, it seems spiteful and sleazy to the visitors. Constraint = Elegance.
  4. Continue to post desirable content in connection with you or your business enterprise, in many instances the only fix for ruinous rhetoric, is a lot more chatter. If you do not have control of Google’s search engine results page for your good name, another person may beat you to it, without your input, and it definitely will finish terribly if he does not take delight in you. If you have not published much of pertinent, well written web content about yourself, then Google has nothing to rank about you, except the content produced by others, some of whom wish to destroy you and your family.

STEP # 3: GET FREE SUPPORT WITH DO-IT-YOURSELF HANDBOOK TO RESTORING YOUR INTERNET CREDIBILITY AND REPUTATION CHALLENGES

  1. A crew of professional online reputation management ninjas have graciously yielded their knowledge and tips, to this free help web site called Defamation911.org
  2. The very same group provides a freebie strategy blog site at www.blog.page1.me
  3. Their Facebook page is https://www.facebook.com/defamation911/

STEP # 4: OBTAIN EXPERIENCED ONLINE REPUTATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES IF THE DILEMMA JUSTIFIES THE EXPENSE

Fee Based Online Reputation Management operations are expanding, since Google (GODgle?) seems to present at least one harmful search engine result, for a large number of business enterprises and business people.

NEVERTHELESS BE CAREFUL!

SPAM email comes from ORM Services based in developing countries, some make the most of despairing, wounded persons, searching for a quick fix for the injury being triggered by their personal search engine result dilemmas. Carry out research, make certain that the professionals you engage share your native tongue, and provide full disclosure about their identity, and precisely where they are located.

STEP # 5: DODGE IT WHERE POSSIBLE – BUT LAWSUITS MAY BE THE ONLY WAY YOU CAN GET RELIEF.

“I’ll sue you!” is quite often the number one reply from a person unjustly maligned by online defamation. Regardless, this kind of action normally carries with it tremendous mental weariness and anguish. It is vital that you relax, and mindfully the emotional and financial toll prior to opening that particular can of worms.

If you decide to enter a legal action against your antagonist, think about NOT looking for monetary damages; if so the law suit will be less challenging. If your vital ambition is the removal of the derogatory search results, then you might only ask for (1) Declaratory Relief and (2) Injunctive Relief. While, declaratory relief is just a notice by the Court/Judge, that one thing is or is not so. For example, if in your proceedings you ask the bench to pronounce that the internet-based accusations made against you are concocted, he or she will, we hope, announce conclusions to that tone. Which means that, the judge might likewise order that the libelous contents be removed from public access by the writer. If the defendant declines, then most of the time all of the search engines would honor the objective of the judgment, findings, and injunctions, and remove the relevant information from their particular search indexes. By doing this, whether or not the injurious content continues inside of the original website or blog, in effect, if it is not available in Google, it is extremely unlikely anybody will see it. Ergo, your intention of repairing the on-going character catastrophe will have been obtained.

If your opponent discerns that the torment he or she caused you has been removed, then the malicious defamation might commence all over again, at this point you may go back to the judge and ask the judge to provide other injunctions. But ideally, the initial directives will incorporate language that impedes additional instances of similar claims.

Stephen Pizzuti’s Advice for Dealing With Internet Harassment

In Buffer on June 1, 2016 at 1:00 pm

Stephen Pizzuti’s Advice for Dealing With Internet Harassment

My name is Stephen Pizzuti and I have been struggling with a malicious and relentless internet smear campaign. My antagonist has targeted me and my business without justification, and accused me of horrible things that I don’t care to repeat. Notwithstanding, I have learned much from the experience, and would like to share what I have learned publicly, so that you, the reader, might be better equipped, should you ever incur the wrath of an online crazy-maker, as I have.

Rule #1: Disengage! Do Not Fee The Trolls

If you notice a false complaint filed against you or your business, it is OK to post a compelling rebuttal immediately, but keep it humble. The attacks against you are a type of psychological warfare; you will win or lose the hearts of your clients, depending on how you respond. NOTE: Only post one rebuttal, otherwise the page will gain higher Google rankings. You can show the reader that the absence of subsequent responses is not proof of guilt, by opening your one-time response with something like the following:

“I will not engage in an ongoing flame-war on this website, it will only stir up further contempt by my stalker (or other appropriate description). But I do respectful submit this one-time response to my accuser”

Rule #2: Follow these basic rules if you do respond:

  1. DO NOT respond to old posts (necroposting), doing so will only spike their Google ranking, Google loves controversy, and gives extra weight to ongoing discussions. Just let old posts die.
  2. DO NOT be too defensive, remember Shakespeare: “The lady doth protest too much, methinks” which is a quote from the 1599/1600 play Hamlet. It has been used as a figure of speech, in various phrasings, to describe someone’s too frequent and vehement attempts to convince others of some matter, thereby making themselves appear defensive, and insincere.
  3. DO NOT name your antagonist. Use third person pronouns such as “he” or “she”. Otherwise, if you use their name or business name, you will only enrage them further. More importantly, it looks trashy and vindictive to the readers. Restraint = Class.
  4. DO post more positive material about you or your business, sometimes the only cure for bad speech, is more speech. If you don’t take control of Google search results for your name, someone else will, and it will end badly if he/she doesn’t like you. If you so not have much in the way of relevant, well written content about yourself, then Google has no choice but to rank the material provided by others, some of who may not like you.

Rule #3: Get Free Help with DIY guides to fixing your online reputation problems

  1. A team of professional online reputation management experts have graciously surrendered their wisdom and techniques, on this non-profit website Defamation911.org
  2. That same team maintains a free tip blog at www.blog.page1.me
  3. Their Facebook pages is https://www.facebook.com/defamation911/
  4. Their LinkedIn Page is Defamation 911 on Linkedin